This does not necessarily mean that blacks are involved more in crime compared to their white or colored counterparts. Instead of people arguing every now and then that Race is not the only factor that determines whether a suspect criminal ends being convicted to die or not. Other factors like education status and social status have been quoted as other basis used to disproportionately apply death penalty Those who advocate for death penalty argue that death penalty has far reaching economic benefits compared to other forms of sentencing like life without parole.
They argue that maintaining a life sentence criminal costs nations lots of resources compared to death penalty. This, nevertheless, is not necessary true. Capital punishment squanders and energy of the whole justice system. Prolonged court session before one can be convicted waste resources that could otherwise be used to compensate families of victims.
As it has already been noted, some suspects get executed on the basis of social status. The numbers of poor people who have been executed in all American states exceed the nuumber of rich suspects who have had the same fate.
Poor people may not have enough fees to hire attorneys who can put up a strong defense in court. Innocent people have thus ended up being executed a simply because they could not hire attorney who could represent them well. The issue of poverty notwithstanding, suspects may get convicted to die simply because an error was made by a judge who is all human and bound to make mistakes.
All worlds' religions including certain cults teach against killing. Christians, for example, state that God is the sole provider of life and no human being has the power or authority to take human life. Other religious hold a similar stand. If almost everyone living on this planet is taught about sanctity of life, why should a state organ, like the judiciary, come in and do something contrary to these teachings. Arguments against death sentence are solid.
Any person looking at these arguments rationally will be convinced that death sentence should be abolished by those who still practice it. We are in the 21 st century and so barbaric executions like those of days of slave should be done away with.
Death penalty fails to respect sanctity of life and should thus be seen as an unfeeling, immoral and inhumane act. The third argument is actually a rebuttal to a claim made by some supporters of the death penalty.
The claim is that the threat of capital punishment reduces violent crimes. The fourth argument is that the length of stay on death row, with its endless appeals, delays, technicalities, and retrials, keep a person waiting for death for years on end. It is both cruel and costly. This is the least credible argument against capital punishment.
The main cause of such inefficiencies is the appeals process, which allows capital cases to bounce back and forth between state and federal courts for years on end. If supporting a death row inmate for the rest their life costs less than putting them to death, and ending their financial burden on society, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty.
As for the additional argument, that making a prisoner wait for years to be executed is cruel, then would not waiting for death in prison for the rest of your life be just as cruel, as in the case of life imprisonment without parole.
Many Americans will tell you why they are in favor of the death penalty. It is what they deserve. It prevents them from ever murdering again. It removes the burden from taxpayers. We all live in a society with the same basic rights and guarantees. We have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness with equal opportunities. This is the basis for our society. It is the foundation on which everything else is built upon.
When someone willfully and flagrantly attacks this foundation by murdering another, robbing them of all they are, and all they will ever be, then that person can no longer be a part of this society. Thus, taking the life of innocent people, we become murderers. On the other hand, the death penalty is the only just punishment for many of the relatives and friends of the victims. It is difficult to live, when you know that the man who killed your loved one is still breathing.
Furthermore, the most common and reasonable argument is that the death penalty is an effective deterrent. The fear of death affects everybody, and criminals are no exception. If they understand that after the serious crime they must bear such punishment, they should think twice before they commit to it. This argument is supported by statistics which reveal that the crime rate in countries where in this form of punishment still exists is far less as compared to those countries wherein it has been abolished.
In conclusion, there are many of pros and cons of the death penalty, but there is no single solution. Because the issues concerning life and death are always the most difficult.
In my opinion, the death penalty is absolutely contrary to moral principles and it is not able to bring us closer to justice. And the question arises: The thesis statement is too general The first paragraph against the death penalty needs further development; it is not enough to just give an example.
In the second one you should have given the statistics you refer to. You are commenting using your WordPress.
The title is Arguments against the Death Penalty yet the author spent the whole time counterclaiming any arguments brought up rather than explaining the logistics behind the arguments. No side was taken in this essay however the title clearly states that the essay should be on arguments against.
Custom Against the Death Penalty Essay Writing Service || Against the Death Penalty Essay samples, help There are a number of issues that are considered controversial in our modern society. Some of these issues are death penalty, abortion and euthanasia.
Debate against death penalty essaysThe death penalty has always been a very controversial issue. Death sentences are usually handed out to people who have been found guilty of capital crime. However it is not so easy to consider death penalty as an easy way to punish the guilty. If the death pena. Argument Against the Death Penalty Essay Words | 14 Pages. Argument Against the Death Penalty Life is sacred. This is an ideal that the majority of people can agree upon to a certain extent. For this reason taking the life of another has always been considered the most deplorable of crimes, one worthy of the harshest available punishment.
(Religious Organizing Against the Death Penalty Website) The main argument that advocates for the death penalty have is that the death penalty deters crime, that the threat of execution is enough to make criminals think twice about committing a capital crime. /5(10). Why I am against the death penalty. The death penalty has been used for years as a way to punish the guilty. Over the years the death penalty has cost our Justice system millions. Besides the cost, it violates our Human Rights Bill and punishes the innocent people. The .