Stem cell research is one of the most controversial topics of our day. As you think about writing a persuasive essay, consider the importance of this topic and how emotive it can be to discuss both the arguments for and against. Any embryonic stem cell research essay needs to carefully weigh up the pros and cons, as well as the ethics involved.
In a lot of ways, where you fall on stem cell research will be indicative of what you think about many different topics such as when you feel life begins, the justice and morality of using human cells to cure diseases, and how you interpret your own religious beliefs.
Begin your introduction with a hook that captures your reader and sets expectations for who you want your audience to ideally be. Do you want to persuade people who might be misinformed on the subject, or do you want to sway people to your side with an emotive anecdote? Then go on to set up your thesis statement, which is the single most important sentence in a persuasive essay, and the foundation of everything you will be writing. Stem cells harvested from foetuses are just not necessary to have the medical research we need to move forward in curing disease and human ailments.
Umbilical cord blood, plus research from adult stem cells, provide all the useful information we could require for research. Moving forward into the body of your essay, it might be relevant to touch on similar debates for comparison, like the one around cloning, or provide a sample of a debate between the two opposing sides.
Your argument for or against could probably use some quotes from experts, or perhaps relevant verses from the holy book of your choice. We need access to federal funding for use in more stem cell research, not just the puny 60 lines we have funding for now. We have federal funding for only 60 stem cell lines.
Give science a chance people, 60 stem cell lines are just not enough! Stanley Schmidt offers a couple of good analogies for those who are confused about which side to take in this situation: The decision will not prevent any new destruction of embryos since it happens as a routine part of the work of fertility clinics, but rather will simply prevent those embryos from contributing to the research.
Would that not be worth 4-day old embryonic cells, which we can now create without even the use of sperm? Federal funding should NOT be limited to use on only the 60 existing stem cell lines. To make progress we must provide more scientists a chance to research this promising cure-all! Says Even Snyder of Harvard. You also added just the right amount of human touch the listing of diseases and how they effect people to get your listeners classmates and teachers interested.
Newreeflady, Stanley Schmidt offers a couple of good analogies for those who are confused about which side to take in this situation: This regard for human life lost it for me. Maybe you should point out that there wont be abortion factories, and no profit will be made form the donations of embryo's.
I am not one. And the Ethicists, are they the same people for the Ethical Treatment of Animals? NewReefLady, Very good layout. However, I agree with ixbx, I would leave out the Catholics. Some may see it as a personal attack on them because they are catholic. Also, IMO i would move the Visualization part of it up to the beginning.
Your speech may have a greater impact if you ask your question right away. It may get people thinking more about the positives than the negatives. Just throwing down my two pennies Corey.
The decision will not prevent any new destruction of embryos since it happens as a routine part of the work of fertility clinics, but rather will simply prevent those embryos from contributing to the research Not good enough? It comes right after the quotes.? Ethicists, I suppose meaning "pro-life" who are against this practice.
Thanks for the input: Besides, it's unfair to issue a blanket condemnation of Catholics for opposing ESCR because there are lots and lots of Catholic sellouts who don't oppose it. Why not mention all of the Protestant, Jewish, and other non-Christian leaders who have condemned ESCR as unethical, as well as the non-religious?
ESCR will peter out before long as there are ethical means of obtaining stem cells. Why not include information on some of the disastrous and catastrophic results of using ESC on human beings? There are some horror stories. Why talk in the theoretical if you can actually cite cases where ESC have produced incredible successes? Because you can't find any? These clinical studies offer solid benefits to patients suffering from heart disease, blood disorders and other afflictions.
Adult stem cells have already been used successfully with patients: The use of a patient's own stem cells is even preferable to using embryonic stem cells because it avoids the problem of the body rejecting cells other than its own. Other new methods such as somatic cell gene therapy are increasingly successful in tissue regeneration and otherwise treating disease. By contrast, embryonic stem ES cells have yet to demonstrate a single human therapeutic benefit. The most recent studies in animals have shown ES cells to be unstable and unpredictable-"errors [that] can lead to premature death or serious abnormality.
Your persuasive speech will be much more effective if you can back up your position with actual success stories instead of theoretical "what if's" and "could be's.
I was scrolling through the older posts and came across your original one polling the reefers here why they are in favor of ESCR, and this interesting comment caught my attention: My teachers are not biology teachers, so they will most likely not be checking that there is a better way to treat immuno-deficiency. This in response to Dr. I guess you can disregard my previous post, as apparently making a tweaked doctored, enhanced, ummmm That's sad, because there are going to be people hearing your argument who are quite ignorant about this subject that will take your speech as the truth.
Those tricky "ethics" can trip you up anywhere.
Stem cell research has generated new knowledge about basic cell system that is critical to understanding the causes of disease, such as cancer. These cells can come from various parts of a body however they are only categorized in two groups, adult stem cells and embryonic stem cells/5(1).
CST Group Persuasive Speech Outline Andrew, Rena, Eyrame, Xiao, Hyun Stem Cell Research Specific Goal: To persuade the audience that stem cell research is a viable medical breakthrough that they can choose to support%(3).
Embryonic Stem Cell Research Persuasive Speech Embryos Human or Just Cells? Embryos have the potential to become humans. After conception, the egg continues to grow into a human being. Jan 26, · Free Essays on Stem Cell Persuasive Speech Outline. Search. Pursuasive Speech essay. Stem Cell Research Stem cells are primary undifferentiated cells that have the ability to differentiate into other cell types depending on the situation.
Stem cell research is a controversial issue in America. Stem cells are a primitive cell that can multiply and conform to be any cells. Unfortunately, the best source for stem cells is human fetal tissues/5(7). Stem cell research is one of the most controversial topics of our day. As you think about writing a persuasive essay, consider the importance of this topic and how emotive it can be to discuss both the arguments for and against.